Should ability to pay determine legality?
George Michael, the recording artist, recently reported that he was having trouble cutting back on his marijuana habit. He admitted that he smoked far more than he felt that he should and needed some help getting this monkey off his back. From his own words (not quoted here) it is clear that he is addicted to the drug and is having trouble cutting back.
George Michael also said that it would be easier if marijuana was legalised. He felt that it was not affecting his ability to work and he could afford it.
How many out there have a career where they can decide when or if they want to show up for work, except for a few contractual requirements for evening gigs? How many make millions at their job? How many make residual money from work they have already done and from that are able to relax and do what they want when they want to and not worry about their next paycheck?
I appreciate that George Michael did work hard to get where he is now, I respect his talent and have enjoyed his music, but the majority of marijuana smokers do not have his financial cushion, and most do not have jobs with the flexibility he has. The reality is that his drug use has been affecting him greatly, but he is not in a position where the affects are imminent or problematic. But for the rest who are not so fortunate, this drug does cause huge problems.
This drug is addictive and does cause problems whether or not it leads to harder drugs. For me the greatest evidence comes from advocates of legal drug use who do not seem to realise just how strange they sound when expressing their opinions.
My best teaching tool against drugs has been to let my children listen to talk shows where marijuana activists are speaking. It does not take long before my children are giggling at this person who has no idea just how foolish he or she sounds.
I think that if I were dying, I might like to try marijuana or some other interesting drug, but I also would not be worried about getting caught and going to jail for it. I value my brain and hope to live a long life and I wish more would respect their own brains and bodies.
George Michael also said that it would be easier if marijuana was legalised. He felt that it was not affecting his ability to work and he could afford it.
How many out there have a career where they can decide when or if they want to show up for work, except for a few contractual requirements for evening gigs? How many make millions at their job? How many make residual money from work they have already done and from that are able to relax and do what they want when they want to and not worry about their next paycheck?
I appreciate that George Michael did work hard to get where he is now, I respect his talent and have enjoyed his music, but the majority of marijuana smokers do not have his financial cushion, and most do not have jobs with the flexibility he has. The reality is that his drug use has been affecting him greatly, but he is not in a position where the affects are imminent or problematic. But for the rest who are not so fortunate, this drug does cause huge problems.
This drug is addictive and does cause problems whether or not it leads to harder drugs. For me the greatest evidence comes from advocates of legal drug use who do not seem to realise just how strange they sound when expressing their opinions.
My best teaching tool against drugs has been to let my children listen to talk shows where marijuana activists are speaking. It does not take long before my children are giggling at this person who has no idea just how foolish he or she sounds.
I think that if I were dying, I might like to try marijuana or some other interesting drug, but I also would not be worried about getting caught and going to jail for it. I value my brain and hope to live a long life and I wish more would respect their own brains and bodies.